Reported Decisions

Reported decisions from matters the firm has argued. These are published court and tribunal rulings, available in the public record, and they are listed without commentary.

Azz Galvanizing Canada Limited v. 1340614 Ontario Inc., et al.

2022 ONSC 1993 (CanLII)

Superior Court of Justice — Ontario
2022-03-30 | 26 pages
[…] Sam Gebrael for Defendant Empire Steel Inc. (“Empire”) No one appearing for Defendant 1340614 Ontario Inc. O/A Innovative Blast Technologies (“IBT”) […]

William Day Construction Limited v. Wilderness Helicopters (2009) Ltd.,

2018 ONSC 2552 (CanLII)

Superior Court of Justice — Ontario
2018-04-11 | 6 pages | cited by 2 documents […] COUNSEL: Ranjan Das and Sam Gebrael for the Moving Party, the Defendant Aleksandar Jovanovic for the Responding Party, the Plaintiff […]

Felton Brushes Limited v. Atlantis Properties Hamilton Inc.,

2020 ONSC 2315 (CanLII)

Mary Young v Masonry Doctors

2023 ONSC 2150 (CanLII)

Superior Court of Justice — Ontario
2023-03-31 | 5 pages
[…] Samir Gebrael, for the defendant AlaaAldin AlRadhi Jason E. Bogle,

jason@bogleslawoffic.com, for the defendant Amirfakhroldin Rahimi […]

Empire Steel Inc. et al. v Dass et al.,

2020 ONSC 2315 (CanLII)

Superior Court of Justice — Ontario 2020-04-16 | 9 pages […] Sam Gebrael, for the Respondent HEARD: April 9, 2020 ENDORSEMENT InTRoduction […]

Empire Steel Inc. v. 2469521 Ontario Inc.

2024 ONSC 60 (CanLII)

Superior Court of Justice — Ontario
2024-01-09 | 24 pages
[…] Sam Gebrael, Counsel for the Plaintiffs – and – ) ) ) 2469521 Ontario Inc., DBA Dass Metal Products & Dass Steel Service Centre, 2835085 Ontario Inc., John Doe Corporation, Jaswant Dass, Preet Dass and Navjot Dass […]

Jerger et al. v Kaloti et al,

2023 ONSC 4544 (CanLII)

Superior Court of Justice — Ontario
2023-08-08 | 33 pages | cited by 1 document […] Sam Gebrael – Lawyer for the Defendants HEARD: March 15, 2023 (by videoconference) […]

Published rulings, not selected highlights.

A reported decision is a ruling a court or tribunal chose to publish, which means it is on the record whether or not it went the firm’s way. That is the difference between this page and a results summary. Reported decisions also matter beyond the parties, because they become the authority later cases are argued from.

Reading them is a reasonable way to assess a firm, since they show the kind of matters it argues and the level of court it appears in. They are not a guide to what your own case is worth, because every ruling reflects its own facts.

A RECORD OF ADVOCACY AND RESULTS

RECOVERED
FOR CLIENTS

$ 0 M+

CASES SUCCESSFULLY RESOLVED

0 +

YEARS FIGHTING FOR CLIENTS

0 +

Why reported decisions matter

Most files never generate one. A decision gets reported when it resolves a point worth citing, which usually means the matter was contested to a ruling rather than settled. A firm with reported decisions has taken cases the other side would not resolve.

For a client the practical significance is narrower than it sounds, and worth saying plainly: a reported decision does not make a firm right for your matter. What it does confirm is that the firm has argued contested cases through to judgment, which is the relevant question if your own claim looks unlikely to settle.

Talk With Our Legal Team

If you have any questions and would like to schedule a call with our legal team for a FREE no-obligation consultation, contact us now. During this call, you can ask any questions as it relates to your accident and/or claim and we’ll discuss your options and possible outcomes.

Don’t delay – call us. Our lines are open 24/7.